ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

A federal judge today vacated an illegal closed-door deal between the U.S. Department of the Interior and a for-profit Alaska Native corporation, King Cove Corp., that exchanged a 10.5-mile corridor of Izembek National Wildlife Refuge and Wilderness lands to enable a 18.9-mile gravel road connecting King Cove and Cold Bay. U.S. District Court of Alaska Judge Sharon Gleason found that the federal government violated the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act.

“We’re grateful that the Court recognized what we’ve been saying for years,” said Jane Davenport, a senior attorney with Defenders of Wildlife. “The Trump administration simply cannot ignore the law and force a land exchange to build a road that would tear out the heart of Izembek’s world-class wildlife habitats, wetlands and wilderness. We will continue to fight for the integrity of Izembek National Wildlife Refuge and our federal conservation statutes.”

While the threat to Izembek National Wildlife Refuge is paused for now, KCC and the State of Alaska are moving forward quickly to build a 2.8-mile road segment leading to refuge and wilderness lands on KCC-owned lands that are within the refuge. Defenders of Wildlife filed a new lawsuit challenging an illegal Refuge Act authorization for that segment and will move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to halt construction.  

Background

In October 2025, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum agreed to transfer roughly 484 acres of congressionally designated refuge and wilderness lands to King Cove Corp. to enable a road between King Cove and Cold Bay. Defenders filed suit challenging the exchange for violating the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act and the Wilderness Act. Today’s ruling found in favor of Defenders on one of its Refuge Act claims and did not rule on its remaining claims.

Located on the Alaskan Peninsula between the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska, the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge and Wilderness provide irreplaceable habitat for hundreds of terrestrial and aquatic species. It is an essential migration stopover for millions of waterfowl, including the Pacific black brant, Taverner’s cackling goose, emperor goose and tundra swan. The refuge is vital habitat for Endangered Species Act-protected species such as the northern sea otter, Steller sea lion and Steller’s eider as well as robust populations of caribou, brown bears, and Pacific salmon. 

For nearly 80 years, Defenders of Wildlife has worked to protect and restore America’s wildlife at risk of extinction, advancing a vision of a future in which wildlife thrives, sustained by broad public support and a resilient network of healthy lands and waters. With a network of more than 2 million supporters, Defenders is an advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard wildlife for generations to come. To learn more, please visit https://defenders.org/newsroom or follow us on Instagram @defendersofwildlife.  

 

Media Contact

Communications Specialist
jcovey@defenders.org

News

Image
2019.08.07 - Florida Panther looking straight at camera - MS 45 - fStop Foundation
WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Memo Underscores Trump Administration’s All-Fronts War on Wildlife

Brian Nesvik, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issued a memorandum explaining to FWS staff that the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on unauthorized “take” applies only to affirmative acts intentionally and purposefully directed at a particular animal. This follows the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the ESA, which took effect this week.
Image
A close up of the face of a Sierra Nevada Red Fox at the edge of a forest in Deschutes County, Oregon.
Washington, D.C.

Court Rules Habitat Must Be Protected After FWS Attempts to Waive Protections for Less Than 40 Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Defenders of Wildlife earned a significant victory for the Endangered Species Act today when a federal district court found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to not designate critical habitat for the endangered Sierra Nevada red fox was a violation of the law.